Dovetail

Differences Between Pre- and Post-1981 Earthquake-Resistant Standards in Japan: Pros and Cons for Buyers

by

/

Japan’s location along the Pacific Ring of Fire makes it highly susceptible to earthquakes, leading to strict regulations on building construction to ensure safety. One critical distinction in Japanese real estate lies in the country’s seismic standards: Pre-1981 Earthquake-Resistant Standards (旧耐震, Kyū-Taishin) and Post-1981 Earthquake-Resistant Standards (新耐震, Shin-Taishin).

This article delves into the key differences between these standards, exploring their implications for buyers and residents. Additionally, we will examine the pros and cons of purchasing and living in buildings constructed under each regulation to help you make informed decisions.


What Are Pre-1981 (Kyū-Taishin) and Post-1981 (Shin-Taishin) Standards?

1. Pre-1981 Standards (Kyū-Taishin)

Buildings constructed before June 1st, 1981 fall under the Pre-1981 Earthquake-Resistant Standards. These regulations were established under the 1950 Building Standards Act (建築基準法, Kenchiku Kijun-hō) and primarily focused on protecting buildings from collapsing during moderate seismic activity.

Key Points:

  • Emphasis on strength to withstand horizontal shaking.
  • Structural designs did not necessarily consider larger, more destructive earthquakes.

However, after the devastating 1978 Miyagi Earthquake caused severe damage even to modern structures, the need for more robust regulations became evident.

2. Post-1981 Standards (Shin-Taishin)

Following the lessons learned from the Miyagi Earthquake, the Japanese government implemented stricter seismic standards starting June 1st, 1981. These regulations aimed not only to minimize collapses but also to safeguard the lives of occupants during large-scale earthquakes.

Key Points:

  • Buildings must withstand seismic forces of a level expected once every several hundred years.
  • Introduction of ductile design, allowing buildings to flex rather than crack or collapse.
  • Enhanced testing and verification processes for materials and construction methods.
  • Some of the buildings built between 1981 and 1983 were Kyū-Taishin. Always check its Earthquake-Resistant Standards 
  • Buildings after 1984 are all Shin-Taishin and can attract more buyers due to the availability of more financing options by banks

The distinction between Kyū-Taishin and Shin-Taishin standards is more than a regulatory shift; it represents a milestone in Japan’s effort to create safer, more earthquake-resilient urban environments.

Summary of Differences Between Kyū-Taishin and Shin-Taishin Buildings

Pros and Cons of Buying and Living in Kyū-Taishin Buildings

Pros

  1. Affordability
    Kyū-Taishin properties tend to be significantly cheaper than their Shin-Taishin counterparts. Buyers on a tight budget may find these properties attractive, particularly in central locations where land values are high.
  2. Location
    Many Kyū-Taishin buildings are situated in prime urban areas, often near transportation hubs, making them convenient for commuting and accessing city amenities.
  3. Larger Floor Plans
    Older buildings frequently offer more spacious layouts, which can be an advantage for families or those seeking ample living space.
  4. Character and Charm
    Some older buildings have unique architectural styles or historic significance, adding a sense of character not often found in newer constructions.

Cons

  1. Seismic Risk
    Kyū-Taishin buildings are inherently less resilient to major earthquakes. Without retrofitting, they pose a higher risk to occupants during severe seismic events.
  2. Higher Maintenance Costs
    Older structures often require more frequent and expensive maintenance due to aging materials and outdated systems.
  3. Limited Financing Options
    Obtaining loans or insurance for Kyū-Taishin properties can be challenging. Many financial institutions are hesitant to approve mortgages for buildings constructed under the old standards.
  4. Resale Value
    Kyū-Taishin buildings tend to depreciate faster and may have a lower resale value compared to newer, safer properties.
  5. Potential Retrofit Costs
    Retrofitting a Kyū-Taishin building to meet Shin-Taishin standards can be costly, especially for larger or more complex structures.

Pros and Cons of Buying and Living in Shin-Taishin Buildings

Pros

  1. Enhanced Safety
    Shin-Taishin buildings are engineered to withstand major earthquakes, offering peace of mind to residents.
  2. Modern Amenities
    These buildings often feature updated facilities, such as energy-efficient systems, advanced elevators, and secure access controls.
  3. Better Financing and Insurance Options
    Financial institutions and insurers are more willing to provide favorable terms for properties built under Shin-Taishin standards, making them easier to purchase.
  4. Higher Resale Value
    Shin-Taishin properties generally retain their value better, making them a solid long-term investment.
  5. Compliance with Current Regulations
    Buyers are assured that Shin-Taishin buildings meet modern building codes, reducing future regulatory risks.

Cons

  1. Higher Costs
    Shin-Taishin properties are often more expensive due to their improved safety features and modern designs.
  2. Smaller Floor Plans
    To maximize profitability, many developers have reduced unit sizes, which may not suit those looking for spacious living arrangements.
  3. Location Trade-Offs
    In urban centers, newer buildings may be located slightly farther from prime areas due to limited land availability.

What to Consider When Choosing Between Kyū-Taishin and Shin-Taishin Buildings

1. Purpose of Purchase

  • Investment: Shin-Taishin properties are typically a safer investment, thanks to better long-term value and buyer demand.
  • Personal Use: If budget constraints are a concern, Kyū-Taishin properties in convenient locations might still be a viable option, especially with retrofitting.

2. Safety Concerns

Buyers should prioritize safety when purchasing a property, especially in earthquake-prone regions. Consider whether retrofitting a Kyū-Taishin building is feasible or if the higher initial cost of a Shin-Taishin property is justifiable for peace of mind.

3. Inspection and Due Diligence

  • Kyū-Taishin Buildings: Always request a structural integrity report and inquire about past retrofitting efforts.
  • Shin-Taishin Buildings: Verify the construction quality and review any recent maintenance records.

4. Budget and Financing

Evaluate your budget and financing options carefully. While Kyū-Taishin buildings might appear affordable upfront, potential retrofitting and maintenance costs should be factored into your decision.

Kyū-Taishin or Shin-Taishin buildings for you

Choosing between a Kyū-Taishin and Shin-Taishin building is a significant decision that depends on your budget, lifestyle, and risk tolerance. While Kyū-Taishin buildings may appeal to those seeking affordability and central locations, the safety and long-term value of Shin-Taishin properties often make them the better choice for many buyers.

For those considering Kyū-Taishin buildings, investing in structural retrofitting is essential to ensure safety and peace of mind. By conducting thorough due diligence and prioritizing safety, buyers can make informed decisions that align with their needs and goals. For this, Dovetail is here for you.